In this short series I shall endeavor, using a "blue collar" approach, to explain in as simple terms as possible the development of what is called "virology".
I call it the virology fraud or the fraud of virology whenever I speak of it. If you look into the Black Nobility and who’s really behind this nonsense, it’s clearly the various Mafias (scammers) who are the frontmen behind it all, who are in front of it all, who are behind it all. Layer upon layer, like a Sarah Lee cheesecake.
Black Nobility is a phrase I've only come across recently, some years ago when I found out about Agenda 21 I looked into various NG0's, The Bilderbergers piqued my interest (Dutch Prince Bernie) & I discovered the European Royal families were all related & the wealth of Sax Coburg Gotha - mind blowing!
Catholicism as the state religion of the Roman Empire is interesting (my family are "chapel"), tried to look into gnostic Christianity, Jesus' missing years etc. so much interesting stuff to thrash out, but the "cause celebre" of the last 4 1/2 years is....you know what... so ATM I'm collating all my "notes" & "research" into "that subject" (before I forget it all) & posting it for posterity.
After I read those articles, I then proceeded to read Dawn's book - "What really Makes you Ill".
It is over 1000 pages and quite scientific. I am basically around half way through, but I suspect I will need to probably read it again as some of it is over my head. That's basically all my "formal" reading has been. Separately, I used to read Kirsch in the past for the "anti-Vax" stuff. It was actually through anti-Vax reading that I discovered there was a "germ theory" controversy, and since I was convinced about anti-Vax some time back I have started now to try and understand the Germ Theory issue. So I was looking at Kirsch a few weeks back for the "Anti-Vax" stuff as it is always entertaining - his $1 million challenges and so on - and was shocked to suddenly find a raging debate over germ theory! From what I could tell he seems to believe in it, which surprised me. So I stopped reading him after that. So the above is basically it.
Cheers Chris, Lester & Parkers book is a MUST read IM0, they like Tracey Northern are just "normal" people who have researched allopathy & concluded it's a fraud, Tracey had an article of hers read out by "no virus" superstar Tom Cowan! Kudos.
While I work on an answer have a read of my compilation "Germ Nation"
A takeaway;.......
The "thing" that is called "terrain theory of disease" is the original concept of disease/illness, the "germ hypothesis (not theory) of disease" is a late 19th century usurper.
Edit, just about everything I've read in the last few years is in the "no virus phsy-op" post
We all need to do the research for ourselves. I have great information on hand that I disseminate, but I want people to verify the information presented by utilizing their own critical thought, logic, and discernment, I don't want to spoon feed....
And Second, homework. Up for some homework Chris? I would like see evidence of your ability to read & comprehend before I answer more questions, so your task for the weekend (should you choose to accept) is, in your own words (aprox 400-500) describe the premise of chapter 4 & the premise of 5 of The Golden Calf http://whale.to/v/golden_calf.html The homework needs to be in by 4pm B.S.T. 15/7/24
I will check out the Cowans book once I have managed to finish the Lester book. (I am afraid I only like to read stuff - I don't like Videos just as a general rule). I also read your "Germ nation" - I like that it was written for the "layman" - very easy to follow and understand.
Yes - in regard to "in the past": I meant exactly what you said - from 18th-early 20th century. So then in answer to my question - improved sanitation in regard to the reduction disease meant just the one thing I stated: clean water without sewage inside it?
Glad you liked "Germ Nation" but to be crystal clear, I didn't write it, I compiled it, from stuff I've copied & pasted, unfortunately because computers hate me...... the original fully sourced document has disappeared.
If the Lester/Parker book is heavy going try Cowans book, 1/4 the size.
Clean water was a MAJ0R contribution to disease reduction, but as disease is multi-causal & dirty water N0T the single cause.....then clean water was not the "one thing" that caused disease reduction. For e.g. here in Britain they were aware of the contaminated water so drank copious amounts of beer to rehydrate...there was even "weak beer" for children!
Thanks Andy. You may not be a Guru, but you seem like someone who even if he does not know the answer to something will be able to find out! These will be very "stupid" newbie questions so I apologise in advance.
So to start with I have a couple of questions to check my understanding of what I have read:
1) I have read how one of the doubts about the germ theory has been the inability to "isolate" viruses themselves, and instead relying on non-specific "anti-bodies" as "proof" for the existence of a virus. Do we accept that "Viruses" even exist at all? I know for example that we do accept that bacteria exist - even though neither Viruses or Bacteria are the cause of diseases.
2) I have also read about how actually most diseases in the past were caused by bad sanitation and they disappeared when sanitation improved. So if I understand this correctly does this mean that:
a) Sanitation in the past was so bad that people would directly ingest faeces via drinking water (which of course would cause disease), and then simply having drinking water that was clean allowed disease to go away. It was basically just this one thing?
Before I begin please understand, me, keyboards, pixels & V.D.U's do not get on, e.g. "'twas 40 years ago..."took me 2 months to write, even "Chapter 1 of An ABC.." was 2 weeks of ...err...err, I aint got an analogy but the neighbours kids learned some new swear words!
Isolation;
When it was seen that isolated bacteria did not cause disease, the cause of disease was blamed on something smaller & so the submicroscopic or invisible (AND hypothetical) virus was invented.
Virologists/microbiologists have never been able to separate out (isolate) any thing, that could possibly be a "virus" (to be a "virus" it must invade a cell) they rely on an indirect test such as death of tissue/cells in a test tube or "anti-body" tests. But bear in mind, as bacteria haven't been proven to cause disease & viruses haven't been proven to exist, so the "anti-body" can't exist as is stated, over to Dr Sam;
When you write "in the past" I'm guessing you mean the influx of millions into urban areas during the industrial revolution? Ancient civilisations understood the need for sanitation, i.e fresh water in-dirty water out, Hanging Gardens of Babylon, Egyptian Canals, Roman aqueducts & the Spanish "conquistadors" were amazed at the health of the South American natives. The importance of fresh water has been known since pre-history, but the industrial revolution took people away from their outdoor agrarian way of life & thrust them into dangerous dirty toxic work inside, away from access to fresh food & clean water...without an infrastructure in place to get rid of the waste...all of it, not just the sewage.
Have a read of Cowans Contagion Myth, good stuff in there easyish to understand, but written in a hurry & not any where near as well researched as Lester & Parkers book, think of it as a "Ladybird book" & ignore the "exosomes as messengers" bit, Cowan's backtracked on that now.
The "no virus" high flyers (like Cowan) provide good info. but IM0 a more down to earth info is found amongst the "normal" people who comment regularly & who aren't making any money from doing so
Would you mind answering a couple of questions for me first Chris?
How did you get on with the links I provided at Aldhissla's substack, did they lead you to any other sources, sources which could be "pro virus" e.g. Nass, Kirsch or "no virus" e.g. dpl, P.M.?
Did you read any more of Dawn Lester/David Parkers work & did you read any more of Tracey Northerns wordpress articles?
You had kindly sent me some links to help me get an introduction to the "germ theory" over at Aldhissla. So I am now convinced in general regarding the falsity of the "Germ Theory". However, I have some very specific questions which are not directly answered by various articles (or maybe I have not understood), and I was wondering if I could ask you them? Thanks.
A blue collar primer to a hotbed of white collar crime 👏👏👏👏👏
Hey,that's brilliant!
I call it the virology fraud or the fraud of virology whenever I speak of it. If you look into the Black Nobility and who’s really behind this nonsense, it’s clearly the various Mafias (scammers) who are the frontmen behind it all, who are in front of it all, who are behind it all. Layer upon layer, like a Sarah Lee cheesecake.
Black Nobility is a phrase I've only come across recently, some years ago when I found out about Agenda 21 I looked into various NG0's, The Bilderbergers piqued my interest (Dutch Prince Bernie) & I discovered the European Royal families were all related & the wealth of Sax Coburg Gotha - mind blowing!
Catholicism as the state religion of the Roman Empire is interesting (my family are "chapel"), tried to look into gnostic Christianity, Jesus' missing years etc. so much interesting stuff to thrash out, but the "cause celebre" of the last 4 1/2 years is....you know what... so ATM I'm collating all my "notes" & "research" into "that subject" (before I forget it all) & posting it for posterity.
Right On!!
Well done, Gryffindor! ;)
After I read those articles, I then proceeded to read Dawn's book - "What really Makes you Ill".
It is over 1000 pages and quite scientific. I am basically around half way through, but I suspect I will need to probably read it again as some of it is over my head. That's basically all my "formal" reading has been. Separately, I used to read Kirsch in the past for the "anti-Vax" stuff. It was actually through anti-Vax reading that I discovered there was a "germ theory" controversy, and since I was convinced about anti-Vax some time back I have started now to try and understand the Germ Theory issue. So I was looking at Kirsch a few weeks back for the "Anti-Vax" stuff as it is always entertaining - his $1 million challenges and so on - and was shocked to suddenly find a raging debate over germ theory! From what I could tell he seems to believe in it, which surprised me. So I stopped reading him after that. So the above is basically it.
Cheers Chris, Lester & Parkers book is a MUST read IM0, they like Tracey Northern are just "normal" people who have researched allopathy & concluded it's a fraud, Tracey had an article of hers read out by "no virus" superstar Tom Cowan! Kudos.
While I work on an answer have a read of my compilation "Germ Nation"
A takeaway;.......
The "thing" that is called "terrain theory of disease" is the original concept of disease/illness, the "germ hypothesis (not theory) of disease" is a late 19th century usurper.
Edit, just about everything I've read in the last few years is in the "no virus phsy-op" post
Thanks for the follow-up Andy. That answers my questions on those subjects. May I continue with my questions?
Chris, I can't reccomend Samantha Baileys video's highly enough, however she also has articles; https://drsambailey.com/resources/articles/
You may ask more questions, but first a caveat;
We all need to do the research for ourselves. I have great information on hand that I disseminate, but I want people to verify the information presented by utilizing their own critical thought, logic, and discernment, I don't want to spoon feed....
And Second, homework. Up for some homework Chris? I would like see evidence of your ability to read & comprehend before I answer more questions, so your task for the weekend (should you choose to accept) is, in your own words (aprox 400-500) describe the premise of chapter 4 & the premise of 5 of The Golden Calf http://whale.to/v/golden_calf.html The homework needs to be in by 4pm B.S.T. 15/7/24
Dear Andy
Thanks so much for all this.
I will check out the Cowans book once I have managed to finish the Lester book. (I am afraid I only like to read stuff - I don't like Videos just as a general rule). I also read your "Germ nation" - I like that it was written for the "layman" - very easy to follow and understand.
Yes - in regard to "in the past": I meant exactly what you said - from 18th-early 20th century. So then in answer to my question - improved sanitation in regard to the reduction disease meant just the one thing I stated: clean water without sewage inside it?
Thanks
Glad you liked "Germ Nation" but to be crystal clear, I didn't write it, I compiled it, from stuff I've copied & pasted, unfortunately because computers hate me...... the original fully sourced document has disappeared.
If the Lester/Parker book is heavy going try Cowans book, 1/4 the size.
The "No Virus Psy-op" post is essentially all my source material, very little video, mostly reading, e.g. https://archive.org/details/leicestersanitat00biggrich/page/n7/mode/2up?view=theater gamzuletova.org is a great source of reading material.
Clean water was a MAJ0R contribution to disease reduction, but as disease is multi-causal & dirty water N0T the single cause.....then clean water was not the "one thing" that caused disease reduction. For e.g. here in Britain they were aware of the contaminated water so drank copious amounts of beer to rehydrate...there was even "weak beer" for children!
Thanks Andy. You may not be a Guru, but you seem like someone who even if he does not know the answer to something will be able to find out! These will be very "stupid" newbie questions so I apologise in advance.
So to start with I have a couple of questions to check my understanding of what I have read:
1) I have read how one of the doubts about the germ theory has been the inability to "isolate" viruses themselves, and instead relying on non-specific "anti-bodies" as "proof" for the existence of a virus. Do we accept that "Viruses" even exist at all? I know for example that we do accept that bacteria exist - even though neither Viruses or Bacteria are the cause of diseases.
2) I have also read about how actually most diseases in the past were caused by bad sanitation and they disappeared when sanitation improved. So if I understand this correctly does this mean that:
a) Sanitation in the past was so bad that people would directly ingest faeces via drinking water (which of course would cause disease), and then simply having drinking water that was clean allowed disease to go away. It was basically just this one thing?
Thanks
Before I begin please understand, me, keyboards, pixels & V.D.U's do not get on, e.g. "'twas 40 years ago..."took me 2 months to write, even "Chapter 1 of An ABC.." was 2 weeks of ...err...err, I aint got an analogy but the neighbours kids learned some new swear words!
Isolation;
When it was seen that isolated bacteria did not cause disease, the cause of disease was blamed on something smaller & so the submicroscopic or invisible (AND hypothetical) virus was invented.
Virologists/microbiologists have never been able to separate out (isolate) any thing, that could possibly be a "virus" (to be a "virus" it must invade a cell) they rely on an indirect test such as death of tissue/cells in a test tube or "anti-body" tests. But bear in mind, as bacteria haven't been proven to cause disease & viruses haven't been proven to exist, so the "anti-body" can't exist as is stated, over to Dr Sam;
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-truth-about-virus-isolation-%F0%9F%A4%AB:f
Her content is pretty good, not long winded or "sciency"
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c?
Steve Falconer makes entertaining non sciency videos, you might need snacks & drinks for some though.
https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9?view=content
Sanitation;
When you write "in the past" I'm guessing you mean the influx of millions into urban areas during the industrial revolution? Ancient civilisations understood the need for sanitation, i.e fresh water in-dirty water out, Hanging Gardens of Babylon, Egyptian Canals, Roman aqueducts & the Spanish "conquistadors" were amazed at the health of the South American natives. The importance of fresh water has been known since pre-history, but the industrial revolution took people away from their outdoor agrarian way of life & thrust them into dangerous dirty toxic work inside, away from access to fresh food & clean water...without an infrastructure in place to get rid of the waste...all of it, not just the sewage.
Have a read of Cowans Contagion Myth, good stuff in there easyish to understand, but written in a hurry & not any where near as well researched as Lester & Parkers book, think of it as a "Ladybird book" & ignore the "exosomes as messengers" bit, Cowan's backtracked on that now.
https://greatreject.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2_5364066440741653295.pdf
The "no virus" high flyers (like Cowan) provide good info. but IM0 a more down to earth info is found amongst the "normal" people who comment regularly & who aren't making any money from doing so
Would you mind answering a couple of questions for me first Chris?
How did you get on with the links I provided at Aldhissla's substack, did they lead you to any other sources, sources which could be "pro virus" e.g. Nass, Kirsch or "no virus" e.g. dpl, P.M.?
Did you read any more of Dawn Lester/David Parkers work & did you read any more of Tracey Northerns wordpress articles?
Dear Andy,
You had kindly sent me some links to help me get an introduction to the "germ theory" over at Aldhissla. So I am now convinced in general regarding the falsity of the "Germ Theory". However, I have some very specific questions which are not directly answered by various articles (or maybe I have not understood), and I was wondering if I could ask you them? Thanks.
Ask away Chris, bit I'm no guru, simply a grunt off a building site.